Levels of Inclusion (Part 1)

I’ve been thinking about this a lot. I don’t really have terms for the different levels, but I can see definite differences between them. And I think any step towards more complete inclusion is a good thing, so no shame about any of this. Just trying to think through the logical steps. I’m going to relate these specifically to churches, since that’s my thing, but I think it applies more widely too.

I’ll probably also focus mostly on autism, since it’s what I know and where I focus most of my mental energy. But to help more people understand it, I’ll also relate it to things like inclusion of women in church and ministry. I’ll also mention other types of disability where I’ve seen attempts at inclusion. And I’m realizing that I have more to say on this than I thought, so this will probably be a series, maybe one level in each post.

Level 1
So you want to make your church services available to people who can’t come into the church. Hurray! This is the first step I see most churches taking – just put the sermons online! People can listen from the comfort of their homes and not have to miss church. That covers a lot of people. The church staff and members don’t even have to think at all about who might be accessing sermons this way and why. Other than finding someone to record and upload the sermons, there’s really no work involved. And that really doesn’t take much time once you’ve got it set up. Even so, I’ve seen pushback when it comes to this simple step. Some people worry that if the sermons are available at home, no one will come to church and the community will be lost.

I don’t know a lot of people who go to church for a sermon. Even if you really like everything a pastor says, you could probably find someone saying most of the same things in a podcast, televised service, etc. I think many people go to church for the community, and if they listen to the sermon from home it’s because it helps them feel more connected so that they can participate more fully. Sorry pastors – nothing you have to say is so important that putting it online will make people stop craving the community and support found in church.

I don’t actually think it’s huge egos that scare some pastors away from this basic first step. More likely it’s a fear of the unknown and discomfort around change. Even a small one that doesn’t actually change the way they do church…shouldn’t it? I think when they speak about people abandoning the community, what they mean is that they don’t know how to do community if their church includes people who don’t come in to take part in person.

Awhile back, I got very angry at a classmate who decided not to put his sermons online because he feared people would stop coming to church. My thought was that he was absolutely right not to do so, because he clearly wasn’t serious about including the people who would benefit anyway. If he wasn’t willing to do the work to extend community, he shouldn’t pretend to care about those people.

Now I see that this was unfair. Change is always a little scary, and nothing in our coursework prepared us for that. In my few classes that discussed technology in terms of things like internet-based churches, I was always the only person who was in favor of it. People insisted that it couldn’t be done, you couldn’t create real community online, and anyway how would you handle things like Communion?

Opening up the church’s audience raises a lot of questions about what church means, who the church community is, and how to minister to them. But an important thing to realize is that the people you would be including by making this change are already there. Offering services for people your church doesn’t currently reach is the first step in acknowledging that they’re there, that you care about being available to them. If you mean that, if you’re committed to continuing to explore ways you can make your church more inclusive, that can be the first step in creating deeper changes down the road to grow your community (both in size and in strength).

Technology offers us many opportunities to be more inclusive, but it’s still fairly new and to fully embrace them we have to be willing to change ourselves and the way we’ve always done things on a fundamental level. If we’re talking about true community, it’s never going to be a simple one-step change. It’s work. There will always be work to do once you start forging a new path. I can see why that would be overwhelming for a new pastor, but I hope that more and more ministers and congregations will decide it’s worth the effort.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Levels of Inclusion (Part 1)

  1. When my grandparents moved from their long-time home in SC up where we are (about 4 hours away), my grandmother wanted a computer for the sole reason she could listen to the services of their home church. That church had a live radio broadcast during services which you could hear online, and she loved being able to listen and feel part of the services even though they were a few hours away.

    Like

    1. Also a great benefit of this! I can’t find the article now, but I’ve seen a piece passed around on Facebook about how inclusion and accessibility make things better for everyone. A company may install an elevator in a building to help people who actually can’t use the stairs, but it will almost certainly wind up being used by people who can. It works in reverse, too. A store recently started selling pre-peeled oranges, obviously marketed more at people who are frequently in a hurry but want healthy snacks, but it was also helpful for people with motor control difficulties. Unfortunately, I think the store has pulled the product because some people complained about it being wasteful. 😦

      But I think many pastors have situations more like this in mind when they explore putting sermons online. People already present in their community and that they’re used to seeing in a pew but who for whatever reason have to miss some services. Without further steps to welcome in those who haven’t and maybe can’t attend the physical services, that’s all it is but that’s still good and useful for those people as a first step. But I hope pastors can be made more aware and given resources so they won’t feel so overwhelmed taking those next steps.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s